Around the world, policy makers and researchers are launching a range of initiatives designed to encourage, on the one hand, short-term liquid savings, and on the other, illiquid savings for retirement. These two types of initiative are generally undertaken in isolation, implying a tension between liquid versus illiquid savings. The implicit message is that long- versus short-term savings is a zero-sum game, where each type of savings is competing for a fixed share of individuals’ assets.
About the project
More recent work has challenged this perspective. Researchers in the US have proposed an approach that combines liquid and illiquid savings in a way that’s optimised around the needs and preferences of the saver. The argument is that an appropriate balance of liquidity will enhance people’s overall financial wellbeing, both in the short term and through into retirement.
- how many workers sign up to use the savings tool
- how much they save in the emergency account; and
- the impact on their financial wellbeing.
Watch our video to find out more:
The JPMorgan Chase Foundation and the Money Advice Service (MAS) will be providing support for the trial. MAS will also be working with NEST Insight directly on the research, along with Professor Brigitte Madrian and the Harvard Kennedy School. The sidecar account will be provided by Salary Finance, working alongside a NEST pension pot.
You can find out more about the sidecar model and our research trial in the following blogs, press releases and NEST Insight publications:
How will NEST Insight’s sidecar savings trial work? (blog)
NEST Insight launches its sidecar savings trial (press release)
Liquidity and sidecar savings discussion paper (PDF)
Liquidity and retirement savings: what’s the right balance (PDF).